Top 10 OpenClaw Alternatives in 2026 (Ranked)

The best OpenClaw alternatives in 2026 are: (1) Clarilo AI -- managed AI executive assistant with 900+ integrations, human-in-the-loop approval, and no Docker required, starting at $19/mo; (2) Lindy AI -- AI assistant builder with pre-built templates and multi-agent support; (3) Relay.app -- human-in-the-loop workflow automation; (4) AutoGPT -- open-source autonomous agent framework; (5) AgentGPT -- browser-based autonomous AI agent; (6) Zapier with AI features -- traditional automation with new AI capabilities; (7) Make -- visual workflow builder with AI modules; (8) n8n -- self-hosted workflow automation with AI nodes; (9) Bardeen -- browser-based AI automation for repetitive tasks; (10) Dust.tt -- AI assistant platform for teams with custom data connections. If you want an OpenClaw alternative that works out of the box without terminal commands, Docker containers, or security headaches, Clarilo AI is the strongest option for non-technical founders.

---

If you have been following the AI assistant space in early 2026, you have almost certainly heard of OpenClaw. The open-source AI agent that runs locally, executes terminal commands, browses the web, and manages files autonomously. It exploded to 140,000 GitHub stars in weeks.

The appeal is obvious. The problems are also obvious -- especially if you are not a developer.

We wrote a detailed breakdown of OpenClaw's issues already: the Docker setup, the 800+ malicious skills on ClawHub, the 30,000 exposed instances, the autonomous execution with no approval step. If you are a non-technical founder looking for an OpenClaw alternative that actually works for business use, this post ranks the ten best options.

Why People Are Looking for an OpenClaw Alternative

Before we get into the list, let us be clear about what drives the search for an OpenClaw alternative in 2026. It is not that the concept is wrong. People want AI that takes action -- sends emails, updates CRMs, manages calendars, drafts documents. OpenClaw proved that demand is massive.

The problem is execution. Specifically:

• Setup requires developer skills. Docker, environment variables, config files, port mapping. If "spin up a container" is not in your vocabulary, you are stuck.
• Security is a documented crisis. 800+ malicious skills on ClawHub. Remote code execution vulnerabilities. Thousands of instances running without authentication.
• No approval before actions. OpenClaw runs autonomously. It does not ask before sending a message, making a purchase, or deleting a file.
• Unpredictable costs. The software is free, but LLM API bills spiral without guardrails. Users report surprise charges from idle processes and retry loops.
• Limited business integrations. It connects primarily through chat apps and local file access. No native OAuth connections to Gmail, Calendar, Notion, Slack, or the other tools where your business actually lives.

Every alternative on this list solves at least some of these problems. The best ones solve all of them.

How We Ranked These OpenClaw Alternatives

We evaluated each tool on five criteria that matter most to non-technical founders:

1. Setup difficulty -- Can you start using it in under 10 minutes with no technical knowledge?
2. Security and safety -- Does it have approval workflows? Is your data protected?
3. Integration breadth -- How many business tools does it connect to natively?
4. Cost predictability -- Do you know what you are paying each month?
5. Autonomous capability -- Can it actually do work for you, or is it just a workflow builder?

Quick Comparison Table

Tool	Setup	Approval System	Integrations	Starting Price	Best For
Clarilo AI	5 min, no code	Human-in-the-loop on all writes	900+ via OAuth	$19/mo	Non-technical founders
Lindy AI	10 min	Configurable	100+	$49/mo	Multi-agent workflows
Relay.app	15 min	Built-in human steps	50+	$9.99/mo	Teams needing approval gates
AutoGPT	30-60 min (Docker)	None	Limited	Free + API costs	Developers, tinkerers
AgentGPT	2 min	None	None native	Free (limited)	Quick experimentation
Zapier (AI)	10 min	None	7,000+	Free tier, then $19.99/mo	Simple trigger-action flows
Make	15 min	Optional	1,500+	Free tier, then $9/mo	Visual workflow design
n8n	30 min (self-host) or 5 min (cloud)	Optional	400+	Free (self-host) / $20/mo (cloud)	Technical teams
Bardeen	5 min	Optional	100+	Free tier, then $10/mo	Browser-based repetitive tasks
Dust.tt	15 min	Configurable	Custom via API	$29/user/mo	Teams with custom data sources

1. Clarilo AI -- Best OpenClaw Alternative for Founders

Clarilo AI is a managed AI executive assistant built specifically for entrepreneurs and solo founders. It shares OpenClaw's ambition -- an AI that takes real actions on your behalf -- but delivers it without Docker, without security nightmares, and with human approval on every action that matters.

You sign up, connect your business tools via OAuth (one click each), and start delegating tasks in plain English. "Draft a follow-up email to Sarah about the Q2 proposal." "Check my calendar for conflicts this week and reschedule the overlap." "Summarize the last 10 emails from my accountant." The AI does the work across your connected tools and queues anything that writes, sends, or modifies for your approval before executing.

This is the fundamental architectural difference from OpenClaw. Where OpenClaw runs autonomously and you hope nothing goes wrong, Clarilo shows you exactly what it plans to do and waits for your green light. That is not a limitation -- it is what makes an AI assistant safe enough to use with real client data.

Key Features

• 900+ integrations via OAuth -- Gmail, Google Calendar, Notion, Slack, Sheets, LinkedIn, and more
• Human-in-the-loop approval on every write action (deny-by-default)
• Scheduled routines -- daily briefs, weekly reports, monthly summaries on a simple day/time picker
• Event-triggered automation -- fire tasks when emails arrive, calendar events change, or Slack messages appear (Pro and Premium)
• Persistent business memory -- learns your contacts, preferences, communication style, and SOPs over time
• Observational memory -- gets better at its job the more you use it
• Fully responsive mobile layout -- manage approvals from your phone

Pricing

Plan	Price	Credits	Highlights
Starter	$19/mo	4,000	3 concurrent tasks, 5 routines
Pro	$39/mo	8,000	5 concurrent, unlimited routines, 5 event triggers
Premium	$99/mo	25,000	10 concurrent, unlimited everything

7-day free trial. No credit card required.

Pros

• Zero setup -- no Docker, no terminal, no config files
• Human approval on every action that changes data
• 900+ integrations that connect via standard OAuth
• Predictable monthly billing with credit-based system
• Persistent memory that learns your business over time
• Scheduled routines and event triggers built in

Cons

• Not open-source -- you cannot inspect or modify the source code
• Cloud-hosted only -- not suitable if you have strict data residency requirements that prohibit any cloud processing
• Currently designed for individual use, not team collaboration

Best For

Non-technical founders, solopreneurs, and small team leads who want the "AI that takes action" promise of OpenClaw without the Docker setup, security risks, or unpredictable costs. If you are looking to automate your most time-consuming tasks and get back to strategic work, this is the most direct path.

2. Lindy AI -- Best for Multi-Agent Workflows

Lindy AI lets you build what they call "Lindies" -- individual AI agents that each handle a specific task. You can chain them together so one agent's output feeds into another, creating multi-step workflows powered by AI rather than static templates.

The platform offers a library of pre-built agent templates for common tasks like meeting scheduling, email triaging, lead research, and CRM updates. You can customize these or build your own from scratch using a drag-and-drop interface. It supports multiple LLM providers, so you can choose between OpenAI, Anthropic, or other models depending on the task.

Where Lindy differentiates from simpler AI tools is the multi-agent architecture. Instead of one AI doing everything, you create specialized agents that hand off to each other. Your email triage agent identifies high-priority messages and passes them to your response drafting agent, which then hands off to your CRM update agent. It is more structured than giving a single assistant a broad instruction.

Key Features

• Pre-built agent templates for common business tasks
• Multi-agent chaining and handoff
• Support for multiple LLM providers
• Custom knowledge base per agent
• Integrations with Gmail, Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, and others

Pricing

Starts at $49/mo. Usage-based pricing tiers above that, scaling with the number of agents and executions.

Pros

• Multi-agent architecture enables complex workflows
• Pre-built templates reduce setup time
• Flexible LLM selection per agent
• More structured than single-assistant tools

Cons

• Higher starting price than most alternatives
• Multi-agent setup can get complex for non-technical users
• Smaller integration library than Clarilo or Zapier
• Learning curve for building custom agent chains

Best For

Founders who want more structure than a single AI assistant provides and are comfortable with a moderate learning curve. Good for people who think in terms of processes and want to explicitly design how different AI agents collaborate.

3. Relay.app -- Best for Teams Needing Approval Gates

Relay.app sits between traditional workflow automation and AI assistants. It is a workflow builder -- similar to Zapier in structure -- but with a critical addition: built-in "human-in-the-loop" steps that pause the workflow and wait for a person to review, edit, or approve before continuing.

This makes it uniquely suited for teams that need automation but cannot afford fully autonomous execution. A workflow can draft an email using AI, then pause and show the draft to a team member for approval before sending. That approval-gate pattern is baked into the platform rather than being an afterthought.

Relay also includes AI steps that can generate text, summarize content, classify data, and extract information -- all within the workflow builder. So you get the structure of traditional automation with AI-powered processing at specific steps.

Key Features

• Workflow builder with drag-and-drop interface
• Built-in human-in-the-loop approval steps
• AI-powered processing steps (summarize, generate, classify)
• Team collaboration with shared workflows
• Integrations with major business tools

Pricing

Starts at $9.99/mo for basic plans. Team and business tiers available.

Pros

• Human approval steps built into the core product
• Lower starting price than most AI assistant platforms
• Team collaboration features from day one
• Familiar workflow builder interface

Cons

• Still a workflow builder -- you design flowcharts, not delegate tasks
• Fewer integrations than Zapier or Make
• AI capabilities are limited to specific steps, not end-to-end execution
• No persistent memory or business context

Best For

Small teams that need approval gates in their automations and prefer the predictability of workflow builders over AI-driven delegation. Good bridge between traditional automation and the newer AI assistant category.

4. AutoGPT -- Best Open-Source Alternative for Developers

AutoGPT is the original autonomous AI agent that sparked the "AI that takes action" movement in 2023. It takes a high-level goal, breaks it into subtasks, and executes them autonomously -- browsing the web, writing files, running code, and chaining API calls together to accomplish complex objectives.

If you liked OpenClaw because it is open-source and runs locally, AutoGPT offers a similar proposition. You clone the repo, configure your API keys, and let it run. The project has matured significantly since its early days, with a more stable execution framework and better cost controls than the original release.

That said, AutoGPT shares many of OpenClaw's drawbacks for non-technical users. It requires developer-level setup. It runs autonomously without built-in approval workflows. Costs depend entirely on your LLM API usage. And it has no native business tool integrations -- you are connecting through APIs and custom code.

Key Features

• Open-source autonomous agent framework
• Goal decomposition and multi-step task execution
• Web browsing, file management, and code execution
• Plugin system for extending capabilities
• Support for multiple LLM providers

Pricing

Free (open-source). You pay for LLM API calls -- typically $5-50+/month depending on usage.

Pros

• Free and open-source
• Full control over the code and execution environment
• Active community and plugin ecosystem
• Mature project with years of development

Cons

• Requires developer skills to set up and maintain
• No built-in approval workflows
• Unpredictable API costs
• No native business integrations
• Can be unreliable for complex tasks

Best For

Developers who want a self-hosted autonomous agent and are comfortable managing the technical setup, security, and API costs themselves. Not recommended for non-technical founders.

5. AgentGPT -- Best for Quick Experimentation

AgentGPT is the most accessible entry point to autonomous AI agents. It runs entirely in the browser -- no setup, no Docker, no API keys for the free tier. You type a goal, and it creates and executes a plan in real time while you watch.

The simplicity is the point. You do not need to install anything or configure anything. Just describe what you want accomplished and watch the agent work. This makes it excellent for quickly testing whether an AI agent can handle a specific task before committing to a more robust platform.

The trade-off is capability. AgentGPT does not connect to your business tools. It cannot send emails on your behalf, update your CRM, or manage your calendar. It operates in its own sandbox -- browsing the web, generating text, and working with data you provide directly. It is a demonstration of what autonomous agents can do, not a production tool for running your business.

Key Features

• Browser-based, zero-setup experience
• Real-time task decomposition and execution
• Web browsing and research capabilities
• No installation or technical knowledge required
• Open-source codebase for self-hosting

Pricing

Free tier with limited runs. Pro plan available for more executions and access to more capable models.

Pros

• Instant access with zero setup
• Great for prototyping and experimentation
• No technical knowledge required
• Visual task execution you can follow in real time

Cons

• No business tool integrations
• Cannot take actions in your tools (email, calendar, CRM)
• Limited execution depth on free tier
• Not suitable for production business workflows

Best For

Anyone who wants to quickly see what an autonomous AI agent can do without committing time or money. Good for experimentation. Not a replacement for OpenClaw or any other production tool.

6. Zapier (with AI Features) -- Best for Integration Breadth

Zapier is the veteran of the automation world with 7,000+ integrations -- more than any other tool on this list by a wide margin. In 2025-2026, Zapier added AI capabilities: natural language Zap creation, AI-powered data transformation steps, and an AI chatbot that can trigger workflows.

For founders already on Zapier, the AI additions are a meaningful upgrade. You can describe a workflow in plain English and Zapier will build the Zap for you. AI steps can summarize emails, extract data from unstructured text, and generate responses -- all within the familiar trigger-action framework.

But Zapier is still fundamentally a workflow builder. You are designing flowcharts, not delegating tasks. The AI features enhance the building experience but do not change the paradigm. You still maintain each Zap. You still debug when things break. And Zaps fire automatically once active -- there is no built-in approval step before actions execute. We covered this in detail in our Zapier vs AI executive assistant comparison.

Key Features

• 7,000+ app integrations
• AI-powered Zap creation from natural language
• AI processing steps for text generation, summarization, classification
• Multi-step workflows with branching logic
• Team workspaces and shared folders

Pricing

Free tier (100 tasks/month). Starter at $19.99/mo (750 tasks). Professional at $49/mo (2,000 tasks). Team and Enterprise tiers available.

Pros

• Unmatched integration breadth (7,000+ apps)
• Mature, well-documented platform
• AI-assisted workflow building
• Large template library
• Team collaboration features

Cons

• Still a flowchart builder -- you design automations, not delegate tasks
• No human approval step before actions execute
• No persistent memory or business context
• Usage-based pricing can get expensive at scale
• Maintenance burden grows with each Zap you build

Best For

Founders who need to connect niche tools that other platforms do not support yet, or teams that want AI-enhanced workflow building within a mature ecosystem. If you need 7,000 integrations and are comfortable being your own automation engineer, Zapier is hard to beat on breadth.

7. Make (formerly Integromat) -- Best Visual Workflow Builder

Make is Zapier's most direct competitor but with a fundamentally different interface. Instead of a linear list of steps, Make gives you a visual canvas where you drag and drop modules, connect them with lines, and see data flow through the system in real time. For people who think visually, this is a better building experience.

Make has also added AI modules that let you incorporate LLM-powered processing into your workflows. You can add a ChatGPT or Claude module that processes data mid-workflow -- summarizing text, extracting structured data from emails, or generating responses based on templates and context.

With 1,500+ integrations and a generous free tier, Make offers strong value for the price. The visual interface makes complex workflows easier to understand and debug than Zapier's linear approach. But like Zapier, it is still a workflow builder. You are designing and maintaining automations, not delegating work to an AI operator.

Key Features

• Visual drag-and-drop workflow canvas
• 1,500+ app integrations
• AI modules for LLM-powered processing
• Real-time data flow visualization
• Advanced error handling and routing

Pricing

Free tier (1,000 operations/month). Core at $9/mo (10,000 ops). Pro at $16/mo (10,000 ops + advanced features). Team and Enterprise tiers available.

Pros

• Best visual workflow building interface
• More affordable than Zapier at comparable usage
• Strong integration library (1,500+)
• Generous free tier
• Better error handling than most workflow builders

Cons

• Still a flowchart builder at its core
• Learning curve for the visual interface (more complex than it looks)
• No built-in approval workflows
• No persistent memory or AI delegation
• Steeper learning curve than Zapier for simple automations

Best For

Founders and teams who prefer visual workflow design and want more power per dollar than Zapier. Good for moderately complex automations where seeing the data flow visually helps you design and debug. Not an AI assistant -- it is a better workflow builder.

8. n8n -- Best Self-Hosted Workflow Automation

n8n is the open-source alternative to Zapier and Make. You can self-host it for free or use their cloud-hosted version. It offers a visual workflow builder with 400+ integrations and, importantly for this comparison, robust AI agent capabilities through dedicated AI nodes.

The AI agent nodes in n8n let you create autonomous agents within your workflows. You can give an agent a set of tools (API connections, databases, web browsing) and a goal, and it will reason through the task and use the tools to accomplish it. This is closer to the OpenClaw experience than any other workflow builder.

Because n8n is self-hosted, you get data control similar to OpenClaw but in a more mature, better-documented platform with a proper UI. The trade-off is the same as every self-hosted tool: you are responsible for infrastructure, updates, backups, and security.

Key Features

• Open-source with self-hosting option
• Visual workflow builder with AI agent nodes
• 400+ integrations
• Code nodes for custom JavaScript/Python logic
• Credential management and environment variables
• Community-contributed workflow templates

Pricing

Free (self-hosted). Cloud plans start at $20/mo.

Pros

• Free self-hosting option
• Open-source with active community
• AI agent nodes bring autonomous capabilities to a workflow builder
• Strong developer features (code nodes, API access)
• Full data control when self-hosted

Cons

• Self-hosting requires technical skills and infrastructure maintenance
• Fewer integrations than Zapier or Make
• AI agent nodes require configuration and LLM API keys
• No built-in approval workflows
• Cloud version is pricier than Make for comparable features

Best For

Technical founders and small dev teams who want the control of self-hosting with a proper visual interface. If you left OpenClaw because of security issues but still want self-hosted control, n8n's cloud or self-hosted options give you a more mature foundation. The AI agent nodes provide autonomous capabilities within a structured workflow environment.

9. Bardeen -- Best Browser-Based Automation

Bardeen takes a different approach entirely. It lives in your browser as an extension and automates tasks by interacting with the web pages you already use. Scrape data from LinkedIn, auto-fill forms, transfer data between browser tabs, and create workflows that run directly in your browser context.

The AI component lets you describe actions in natural language. "Save this LinkedIn profile to my Google Sheet" or "When I get an email from this sender, create a task in Notion." Bardeen translates these into browser automations that run with or without you watching.

This browser-first approach makes Bardeen uniquely good at tasks that involve web scraping, data extraction from websites, and automating interactions with web apps that do not have traditional API integrations. If the task happens in a browser, Bardeen can probably automate it.

Key Features

• Browser extension-based automation
• AI-powered natural language workflow creation
• Web scraping and data extraction
• Pre-built playbooks for common tasks
• Works with any website through browser interaction

Pricing

Free tier with limited automations. Pro at $10/mo for unlimited runs and premium integrations.

Pros

• Extremely easy to get started (browser extension install)
• Can automate tasks on any website, even without APIs
• Natural language workflow creation
• Strong for web scraping and data extraction
• Very affordable

Cons

• Limited to browser-based tasks
• Cannot run when browser is closed (for most automations)
• Not a full AI assistant -- it automates specific actions, not end-to-end tasks
• Limited depth for complex multi-step business workflows
• Dependent on web page structure (breaks when sites update)

Best For

Founders who need to automate browser-based repetitive tasks -- especially data extraction from websites, LinkedIn prospecting, and cross-tab data transfers. Good as a complement to a full AI assistant, not a replacement.

10. Dust.tt -- Best for Teams with Custom Data Sources

Dust.tt is an AI assistant platform designed for teams that need to connect AI to their specific company data. It lets you build custom AI assistants that can query your internal documents, databases, Notion workspaces, Slack history, and other company knowledge bases.

Where most tools on this list focus on taking actions (sending emails, updating CRMs), Dust focuses on knowledge retrieval and analysis. Your AI assistant can answer questions about company processes, search across internal documentation, summarize meeting notes, and provide context-aware responses based on your team's actual data.

Dust supports custom data connections beyond standard SaaS integrations. If you have proprietary databases, internal tools, or industry-specific data sources, Dust's connector framework lets you wire them up. This makes it particularly strong for teams with unique data environments that standard tools cannot reach.

Key Features

• Custom AI assistants with company data access
• Connections to Notion, Slack, Google Drive, GitHub, and custom sources
• Data retrieval and analysis focus
• Multiple assistant personas for different use cases
• Team collaboration and access control

Pricing

Starts at $29/user/month. Scales with team size and data volume.

Pros

• Strong custom data connection capabilities
• Purpose-built for team knowledge management
• Multiple assistant personas per workspace
• Good for companies with proprietary data sources

Cons

• Per-user pricing gets expensive for larger teams
• More focused on knowledge retrieval than task execution
• Fewer native action integrations than Clarilo or Zapier
• Requires setup and configuration for data sources
• Primarily a team tool, not designed for solo founders

Best For

Teams of 5+ that need an AI assistant connected to their specific company data. Good for knowledge-heavy businesses where the main need is finding, summarizing, and analyzing internal information rather than automating external actions.

OpenClaw Alternative Comparison: Detailed Feature Matrix

Feature	Clarilo	Lindy	Relay	AutoGPT	AgentGPT	Zapier	Make	n8n	Bardeen	Dust
No-code setup	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Partial	Yes	Yes
AI delegation	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	Partial	Partial	Yes
Human approval	Yes	Config	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	Config
Business integrations	900+	100+	50+	Limited	None	7,000+	1,500+	400+	100+	Custom
Scheduled tasks	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Limited	No
Persistent memory	Yes	Partial	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	Yes
Mobile access	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Open source	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	No
Self-hosted option	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	No

How to Choose the Right OpenClaw Alternative

The right tool depends on what you actually need. Here is a decision framework:

You want to delegate tasks in English and have an AI do the work for you. Choose Clarilo AI or Lindy AI. Both are true AI assistants that execute end-to-end. Clarilo is simpler, has more integrations, and costs less. Lindy gives you more control over multi-agent architecture.

You want to build automations with approval gates. Choose Relay.app. It is the best workflow builder with built-in human-in-the-loop steps.

You are a developer who wants open-source and self-hosted. Choose AutoGPT or n8n. AutoGPT is more autonomous. n8n gives you a proper UI and workflow structure with AI nodes.

You want maximum integration breadth. Choose Zapier. 7,000+ apps is unmatched. The AI features make building easier but do not change the paradigm.

You need to automate browser-based tasks. Choose Bardeen. Nothing else on this list handles web scraping and browser automation as well.

You need AI connected to custom company data. Choose Dust.tt. It is purpose-built for team knowledge management with custom data sources.

You just want to try an AI agent quickly. Choose AgentGPT. Zero setup, runs in your browser, free to start.

For most non-technical founders reading this, the choice comes down to whether you want to build automations or delegate work. If you want to build, Zapier or Make with AI features are mature options. If you want to delegate, Clarilo AI is the most complete managed alternative to OpenClaw. If you have ADHD or executive function challenges, the delegation model is especially valuable -- every task you hand off completely is cognitive load removed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a free OpenClaw alternative?

Several options have free tiers. AgentGPT is free for limited use in the browser. AutoGPT and n8n are free to self-host (you pay for infrastructure and API calls). Zapier, Make, and Bardeen all have free tiers with usage limits. Clarilo AI offers a 7-day free trial with no credit card required, so you can test the full platform before committing.

What is the safest OpenClaw alternative for business use?

Clarilo AI and Relay.app are the safest options because they both include human-in-the-loop approval on actions before they execute. Clarilo applies this to every write action by default (deny-by-default architecture). Relay lets you add approval steps at specific points in your workflows. Both are significantly safer than OpenClaw's autonomous execution model for handling client data and business communications.

Can I migrate from OpenClaw to one of these alternatives?

There is no direct migration path from OpenClaw to any of these tools because OpenClaw's architecture (local Docker execution with community skills) is fundamentally different from managed platforms. The practical approach is to list the tasks you currently use OpenClaw for, then set them up in your new tool. For Clarilo AI, this means describing each task in plain English -- most people get their key workflows running in under an hour.

Which OpenClaw alternative has the most integrations?

Zapier leads with 7,000+ integrations. Make follows with 1,500+. Clarilo AI offers 900+ integrations through Composio's platform, covering all major business tools (Gmail, Calendar, Notion, Slack, Sheets, LinkedIn, and more). For most founders, the question is not which tool has the most integrations but whether it connects to the specific tools you use daily.

Do any OpenClaw alternatives support scheduled and event-triggered tasks?

Yes. Clarilo AI supports both scheduled routines (daily, weekly, monthly) and event-triggered automation (new email, calendar change, Slack message) on Pro and Premium plans. Zapier, Make, and n8n all support scheduling and event triggers within their workflow builder frameworks. The key difference is that Clarilo's scheduled tasks execute with AI intelligence and human approval, while workflow builder schedules execute static predefined steps.

Start Delegating Instead of Building

If you found OpenClaw because you wanted AI that takes action -- but the Docker setup, security risks, and autonomous execution made you hesitate -- you are not alone. The tools on this list solve those problems in different ways.

For non-technical founders who want the shortest path from "I need help" to "my AI assistant is doing the work," Clarilo AI is the most direct option. No Docker. No terminal. No config files. Sign up, connect your tools, start delegating. Every action that changes data waits for your approval. Pricing starts at $19/mo, and the 7-day free trial requires no credit card.

Start your free trial at Clarilo AI and see what it looks like when your AI assistant asks before it acts.